Notice of Hearing
In the County Court at Central London
Claim Number E35YM660
Date 14 January 2020
Sealed The County Court
DR SHANTANU PANIGRAHI 1st Claimant Ref
Mrs THERESA MAY – PRIME MINISTER OF THE UNITED KINGDOM 1st Defendant Ref Z1819776/TBL/A4
TAKE NOTICE that the Reconsideration of the Application for Permission to Appeal at an Oral Hearing will take place on
3 April 2020 at 2.00 PM
at the County Court at Central London, R.C.J, Thomas More Building, Royal Courts Of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2 LL
When you should attend
30 minutes has been allowed for the Hearing
Please Note: This case may be released to another Judge, possibly at a different Court
LISTING POLICY: The court’s listing policy is determined by the senior judge and implemented by staff in accordance with his directions. Your case may not be allocated to a judge until the day of the hearing, and may have to wait in the unassigned list until a judge becomes available to hear it. Every effort will be made to ensure that your case is heard at this or another convenient court. If it is not possible to provide a judge to hear your case the court and Her Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service will not be responsible for any costs incurred in the absence of any departure from listing policy due to maladministration. This may mean that your case will not be called immediately at the time scheduled, but may be heard later in the day. We will try to ensure that if your case is listed in the morning it is heard by 1 pm and if your case is listed in the afternoon it is heard by 4 pm. In some circumstances it is possible that your hearing could overrun. You and any witnesses should therefore be available until the end of these periods or even later. If there are special reasons why this is inconvenient you may make a short notice application to a circuit judge to adjourn. Ordinary inconveniences arising from the fact of being in the unassigned list will not be sufficient reason for an adjournmenet, nor will the fact that both parties agree to the an adjournment. ACCESSIBILITY: Please inform us as soon as possible if you, your witnesses or legal representatives have a physical disability that may affect your attendance at this court. We can makd alternative arrangements for the case to be heard in a suitable court room by calling the Customer Service Team on 0300 123 5577.
PREPARATION FOR THE HEARING:
N1 Claim Form
Brief details of Claim
This Claim is brought for compensation and damages suffered by me as the Claimant against the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Mrs Theresa May for her failure in her duties to consider my defence against a vitriolic attack launched at me to her by an organisation calling itself Victims of Panigrahi Association (VOPA) but which in reality was set up to harrass and intimidate me to make my life near impossible in the United Kingdom through state-sponsored criminal anonymous emails to me; and by her overseeing the state-persecution of me through the National Health Service. This failure in conducting the Prime Minister's official government business through due diligence was indicative of her negligence, incompetence or downright malicious prejudice against me as the Claimant. She did not even acknowledge the representation that I made through an open letter at my website:https://shantanup.wordpress.com/2018/08/26/an-open-letter-in-my-defence-to-prime-minister-of-the-united-kingdom-mrs-theresa-may/#comments.
Particulars of Claim
VOPA is a persecutory organisation that sent me criminal anonymous emails over the past 11 months and made a representation directly to the Prime Minister at the Administrative Office of 10 Downing Street and through Ms Christine Worsley of Her Majesty's Court and Tribunal Service which represented vitriolic attacks on my character and mental disposition as a perfectly sane human being. It's actions were intended to destroy my reputation and make living in the United Kingdom a nightmare for me. This organisation's activities were state-sponsored as evidenced by the lack of Police action to my repeated appeals for the criminals to be identified and prosecuted for criminal harrassment.
It is hereby alleged that the Prime Minister failed in her duties through negligence, incompetence or deliberately malicious intent (consistent to her responses to my representation to her while she was Home Secretary) to get her to outlaw VOPA as a terrorist organisation and get the Police to prosecute its secretive personnel. Further, she ignored my plea for defence consideration against these scurrilous attacks to be taken from my website https://shantanup.wordpress.com/diary-2/ that I brought to her attention and failed to ask the Lord Chancellor to whom I had complained about the Courts not administering a lawful Hearing to hear my Case to take appropriate action on my behalf. The Prime Minister thereby obstructed justice and caused me further suffering to what I had endured over the past 19 years in the United Kingdom through the UK State's manipulation of the National Health Service to enforce mental health treatment on me when I am a simple satya-advaitist Hindu practicing truth accommodation; which is not a medical disorder requiring the anti-psychotic and anti-depressant medication that was forced upon me by the UK State. This plea she ignored because she had overseen the state-persecution as the Home Secretary once and as the Prime Minister who was now in charge.
I am therefore seeking substantial damages from Mrs Theresa May for her dismal attitude towards me. Whilst I consider that the financial reparations that I am demanding should be in the millions of pounds, I cannot afford the Court Fee for such a Claim amount and am consequently forced to apply for only £3,000 in the hope that the Judge presiding would use his or her discretion to award me the higher amount of damages and compensation. Completing a Fee Remission Form is not appropriate because I do not have any access to my wife's financial resources and other assets.
State why the Judge who made the order you are appealing against was wrong
The Judge did not give me the opportunity to question the perpertrators of dastardly criminality who manipulated the Legal Ombudsman and the Solicitors Regulations Authority into obstructing justice as evidenced by the fact that my Blog shantanup.wordpress.com was archived and suspended to prevent people around the world reading my journalism of how the UK State persecuted me over 20 years through the use of agents overseas and at home, including the Mental Health Authorities who are singled out for punishment because of its misdiagnosis of my mental health condition that was explained on numerous occasions as being the religion of satya-advaita or truth accommodation.
What are you asking the Court to do?
It is ordered that the UK Treasury pay the Claimant £15 million in damages and compensation for the destruction of a promising human life over 20 years of failures in the Law Enforcment processes.
State the evidence you wish to rely on.
The Mental Health authorities and the wider National Health Service in complicity persecuted me over 20 years with pointless interrogations and enforced incarcerations in mental hospital and in the Community through implicit semidetention by drug enforcement despite numerous protests that I had been victimised by the UK State by criminal anonymous emails that were then used to refer me to a Forensic Psychiatrist as shown in the document submitted to the Court by email on 15 August 2019. These issues were discussed with the Surgery of Dr Shah at Long Catlis Road on 15 August 2019 during a specific appointment to discuss the preliminary Appellants Notice of 7 August 2019 that was returned to me by the Civil Appeals Office for directing to the County Court at Central London with a cheque for £240 that was enclosed. The correct fee that the Civil Appeals Office should have advised me was £120. This shows that Mr D Jenkins of Queens Bench Appeal Court had given me the wrong directions akin to the prevarications on my Claim to the Queens Bench of the High Court for the appeal of Master Eastman's striking out of the Claim against Kent Police and co-conspirators during 2017.
The Solicitors Regulation Authority has refused to provide a reply to the complaint against the Legal Ombudsman and numerous lawyers and law firms, the latest evidence for which was submitted to the Court by email on 15 August 2019.
The Appellants Notice referred to the Central London County Court was copied to the Prime Ministers Office and Wordpress with regard to its misdemeanour in acting on the direct instructions of the Mental Health authorities to disable my Blog http//shantanup.wordpress.com. to prevent my journalism and lifetimes achievements in science and religion from being accessed by the population of the world after I had maintained my work over several years without any complaints from Wordpress. It is alleged that the sole purpose of this act was the wanton destruction of a human beings life from intense State-organised persecution.