Subject: Autism Referral by Canada House's Consultant Psychiatrist Dr Odesanya
To Administrator Maudsley Hospital
Dear Sir 1. I have this morning received a letter from Medway Clinical Commissioning Group (MCCG) as shown in the attached: FrMedwayClinicalCommissioningGroup(AutismReferralFundingApproved)5Mar2020.docx.
2. I must take an early opportunity to stress emphatically that I am not autistic; I am a satyaadvaitist in Hindu terminology. Translated into English this term means that I am a truth accommodationist. Kindly read about this here: Selfadvice for Sanatan Dharma being the eternal law: https://www.shanpanigrahi.co.uk/445273580 Selfadvice for Sanatan Dharma being the eternal law Attachment to theories and beliefs leads to downfall. Avoid all forms of internetting communications. Do not see...
3. I believe in the existence of a Creator God, Sri Krishna, who is represented in the Trimurti by Brahma, the sattvic god who guides me in my search for truth by identifying my truth path in life.
4. I should be grateful for an early appointment at Maudsley as I have a Court Hearing at the Central London County Court on 3 April 2020 at 2.00 pm where the Judge will hear my long-standing complaint against the National Health Service of misdiagnosis and mistreatment verging on negligence if not criminally-motivated and which is the subject of substantial damages and compensation (of £1 million or more) as I have previously made clear to the MCCG.
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Kent ME8 0SL
13 March 2020 Update:
There are still 20 days to go before the Hearing in the Central London County Court with a Circuit Judge: if no letters come from Canada House in that time, I will not go to this Hearing. If some letter of appointment comes from Canada House in the meantime it will have to respond to what I have Blogged or a Mental Health Tribunal will do so through the passage of time. One way or the other this matter will be resolved by 3 April 2020 through Court Judgment on the reconsideration of permission to Appeal E35YM660 in my absence from the Hearing of course. For that I will go to the 19 March 2020 11.00 am appointment with Charles Stigant at Medway and Swale Advocacy Partnership so that the preliminary investigation takes place and is completed before Mental Health Tribunal is asked to consider the Case while I stay on in the Community or get incarcerated a third time by the authorities. My Diary Files have not seen the light of day and these are vital evidence to clear my name as a sane human being who has merely navigated Brahman-Nature through all his activities and endeavours from the isolation of my home.
15 March 2020 Update:
Application for extension of time of 12-18 months at an oral hearing to the Circuit Judge on 3 April 2020 at 2.00 pm at the Central London County Court
Reference: Notice of Hearing dated 14 January 2020 on Claim Number E35YM660
The Court Hearing on 3 April 2020, 2.00 pm is for a reconsideration of Order of the Court dated 24 September 2019 by His Honour Judge Letham for his refusal of permission to Appeal the Order of Deputy District Judge Smith made on 14 January 2019; and upon submission within 7 days of receipt of the Order for a reconsideration of that application for permission to appeal, this request being executed on Thursday, 3 October 2019, 09:21:03 BST with a progress report being sought on 8 November 2019, 19.59 hours; and leave to submit orally against the Order dated 24 September 2019 at a Hearing for the reconsideration of permission to Appeal being granted by the Court on 14 January 2020.
Justification: The justification for an extension of time for the oral submission was initially made through an application to the Court dated 11 March 2020, 12.26 pm by email.
The Claimant’s arguments for granting an extension of time are as follows:
The Order of 24 September 2019 was based upon consideration of the Claimants Appellant’s Notice dated the 27 August 2019 and the file of papers. It is submitted that:
1. His Honour Deputy District Judge (DDJ) Smith erred in law in three respects in the Court Order dated 14 January 2019:
(a) by not giving the Claimant the opportunity to seek an estimated extension of time implicit in his delays for the filing of amended Particulars of Claim. The 14 days allowed by DDJ Smith in the 14 January 2019 Order was woefully inadequate for the task of assembling the evidence in this civil litigation in such a manner that the perpetrators of criminal misdemeanours would not be able to defend against the particulars of Claim. It has taken the Claimant over one year from the date of the Order to prove beyond any doubt whatsoever that the National Health Service was grossly negligent or criminally-motivated with the correct diagnosis and treatment of his mental condition over the past 22 years as shown in the 9 January 2020 dated Care Plan from Dr Odesanya of Canada House where the Claimant has now been referred to the Autism Spectrum Diagnostic Services of Maudsley Hospital from initially being diagnosed as having persistent delusional disorder. Notwithstanding this continuing referral, the Claimant submits that he is autistic of a special kind that he describes as satyaadvaita or truth accommodating behaviour which is not a mental disorder requiring medications of any kind whether of anti-psychotic or anti-depressant types that he hopes the final examination at Maudsley Hospital will reveal in due course. His contention is that satyaadvaita condition of Autism Spectrum is a highly desirable behavioural trait that the Claimant has inherited as it aids survival of the human species in the most hostile environment that he has faced in the United Kingdom through the persecution organised intrinsically by Nature as defined under his conception of Brahman-Nature In the vyvaharika level of reality. This remains to be seen.
(b) the Particulars of Claim in the Claim Form were outlined in sufficient detail to begin the process of identifying the responsible respondents who were party to the Claim given that over 30 (close to 40) law firms, solicitors and advocates were approached by the Claimant but were manipulated by the State of Brahman-Nature associated humanity not to cooperate with him in providing legal advice and legal representation by an organisation naming itself ‘Victims of Panigrahi Association’ (VOPA) under the protective umbrella of the Police, the Legal Ombudsman, the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the Financial Ombudsman Service of the United Kingdom; and hence his allegation that the Claimant has made of state-organised persecution by a secretive Big Brother Police State in the United Kingdom.
(c ) his failure to take account that the principle issue in the Claim was not that the Prime Minister failed in her and his duties to the State (this they discharged) but that the Defendants obstructed justice in office against the Claimant and then repeated this by filing a pointless and malicious defence by stating that the Claim Form’s Particulars of Claim did not show a cause of action against the Defendant who abused his and her position of power to effectively manipulate the respondent institutions and VOPA to perpetrate persecution upon the Claimant and then disable his Blog at Wordpress.com which he had used as the final and ultimate level of justice attained by publicising the persecution that he had suffered. It is further argued that the Prime Minister abused his position of power as the Executive of the nation by not instructing the Lord Chancellor to examine the allegation reported to Her Majesty the Queen under petition that a lawful Hearing had never been implemented by the Ministry of Justice to hear the Claimant’s original complaint 20 years ago against the National Health Service that caused the dismantlement of his scientific career at the University of Greenwich as well as the loss of redundancy payment of around £55,000 or £10,000 per annum as medical retirement from a trumped up charge by the University that the Claimant had been blameworthy of gross misconduct at the workplace and therefore should be dismissed from service summarily without consideration of defence to his actions and conduct; an issue that also led unfairly to his loss of Shell Cashier’s job in the subsequent years following this employment.
2. His Honour Judge Letham erred in law on four counts in the Court Order dated 24 September 2019:
(a) by not granting a Hearing there and then when DDJ Smith had also failed to do so considering that the Defendant had continued to keep silent to the repeated emails that the Claimant submitted to the Defendant as his evidence surfaced and permitted him to develop the updated Particulars of Claim that his single-handed investigations continued to generate and the state-persecution was unravelled and uncovered by him.
(b) in being presumptuous that the Appeal had no real prospect of success when the Claimant was still in the process of assembling the evidence of state-organised persecution.
(c) in failing to take account of the fact that the Appellant’s Notice was assembled at a time when the Claimant was being persecuted by VOPA and which continued right up to mid-March 2020.
(d) stating that the Claimant failed to plead a coherent case; this could not be correct if the Claim Form is revisited with these present updated Particulars of Case that the Court received timely and countless emailed documents on as evidence since the Order was issued and which should all now be on the Court File for future reference.
(e) since no Defence to this updated Particulars of Claim has been filed by the Defendant the correct decision would have been to summarily issue the Orders that the Claimant requested, namely that:
(i) damages and compensation of £15 million to be paid to the Claimant by the UK Treasury; and
(ii) full restoration to be effected of the Claimant’s Wordpress Blog https://shantanup.wordpress.com.
3. In summary, the justification for granting an indefinite extension of time is based upon the aforementioned arguments of the failure and collapse in Case Management by the above cited Judges concerned with the disposal of Claimant's Claim; and consequently the appropriate decision would now be to grant the Claimant’s permission to Appeal His Honour Judge Letham’s Order dated 24 September 2019.
This application was submitted to Court, the Defendant, and the associated primary Respondent (Wordpress) by email on 14 March 15.37 hours by:
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi (Claimant)
3 Hoath Lane
Kent ME8 0SL
Edited: 15 March 2020, 17.20 hours