Correspondence to establish Secular Human Rights
From European Court of Human Rights Contact point Press It was with the best of intentions that I copied you into this email to find out when it is that we are seeing Dr Odesanya for although as you note I had sent this email to Kate Potter of Bark because of uncertainties concerning the appointment of a new Vocational Advisor at Porchlight (Aspirations) for me or a Care Coordinator at Britton House on the consideration by Dr Odesanya of whether your complaint against me to him was justified and so the termination of appoiintment Form (Exit Form) was acceptable to the Mental Health authorities, I did not receive an email back from Julie Palmer, nor KMPT PALS or KMPTLegalServices. Kate Potter is therefore my only saviour in this regard. You are entitled to know that and pass it on to the Mental Health authorities as is your duty to do so for I only accepted termination of association with Porchlight in duress. You should inform the European Council immediately of this dispute so that it considers withdrawing its funding of Porchlight's activities as inhuman and contrary to the provisions of the Convention of Human Rights as monitored by the European Court of Human Rights under its Articles on Freedom of Expression and Discrimination (Religious discrimination in my Case. You should be aware that this Case was lodged in the Court in 2001-2002 and is still under consideration by the Court and the European Council whose jurisdiction you must accede to until the end of the transition period on 31 December 2020 in the Case of the Institution of the European Council, and indefinitely in the case of the European Court of Human Rights. I am copying this email to the Speaker of the House of Commons to keep him informed that I am greatly disappointed at the failure of Her Majesty's Government to institute a Private Members Bill Lucy Fleming Cc:firstname.lastname@example.org,email@example.com,INFO@NFARAGE.CO.UK Wed, 21 Oct at 17:53 Dear Lucy …. I applied to the European Court of Human Rights on 21 October 2000 was given a case Number of PN22010. The case listed for a Hearing on 11 September 2001 under 64851/01 was rejected as inadmissable, and further explained on 21st May 2002: with reference to your numerous recent telephone calls and faxed letter of 11 May 2002 I must draw your attention to the following points: Your application 64851/01 was rejected by the Court on 11 September 2001; no appeal lies against this decision; if you have fresh complaints concerning alleged violations of your rights under the Convention you should submit them in writing. If they refer to matters already decided in your previous application, any new application would be rejected pursuant to Article 35 2(b) of the Convention. In the light of the above, I must inform you that the Registry of the Court can no longer accept any telephone calls from you.' I wrote back stating that these were indeed fresh complaints of violations of my rights under the European Convention of Human Rights and I should therefore be grateful for a consideration of the Case. The European Court of Human Rights wrote back on 8 July 2002 and again on 30 July 2002 giving two new File Numbers inviting a fresh application, to which I took no action. I referred the matter instead to the Council of Europe, the parent body of the European Court of Human Rights under an application for asylum. From European Court of Human Rights autoacknowledgment Your request has been sent to the European Court of Human Rights. Please note that if your request concerns an application which you have brought before the Court or which you wish to bring before the Court, it will not be dealt with. If you wish to contact the Registry in relation to an application, you must do it by fax or post. 21.38 hours 21 October 2020
Your communication to me this morning3 MAIL/Sent YAHOO BLOCKING TEAM To:northkent Cc:firstname.lastname@example.org,Enquiries Kent Thu, 22 Oct at 13:04 Dear Magistrate The deadline I had set of 20 October 12.00 hours elapsed (as shown in the attached Toindeed20Oct2020.docx) and as I my time on Earth is limited I had accordingly revised my Appeal (see attached FrEuropeanCourtofHumanRights21Oct2020.docs) to the European Court of Human Rights (Case No PN22010; Hearing disposal 64851/01) under my application for asylum in one of the Council of Europe States (France's OFPRA had already given me permission to arrive from Dover to Calais on my expired passport at the time of my attempted travel to France in 2004) but which the Dover Police (Kent Police) would not accept as legitimate. However, if the Magistrate is now prepared to reconsider the private prosecution of the Chief Constable of Kent Police for overseeing the systematic tolerance of Hate Crimes against me over the past 22 years of political detention through the Mental Health Institution of the United Kingdom to cover up roughly a thousand criminals who persecuted me from within the United Kingdom, in the United States of America, in the Supreme Court of India, and in the United Nations through successive General Secretaries, starting with Mr Kofi Annan that you know about from the Case originally lodged against Mr Anthony Blair and Mr George Bush at the North Kent Magistrates Court and at the Central Criminal Court (Old Bailey), with the result that my Blog https://shantanup.wordpress.com and Linkedin publication page of articles, and the Twitter Account were suppressed to prevent the population of the United Kingdom and outside knowing about my life and works as my legacy to mankind, I will gladly complete the necessary forms for the private prosecution of the Chief Constable of Kent Police, who is hereby asked to submit to the Court copied to me whether the Constabulary intends to defend the allegation of Hate Crime on me, or needs to be summoned to the North Kent Magistrates Court immediately to face the prosecution, with the Crown Prosecution Service and the Independent Office for Police Conduct, as co-conspirators in the Hate Crime. Please treat this email as permission to prosecute the reported criminals Yours sincerely Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL Tel: 07967789619 On Thursday, 22 October 2020, 12:14:30 BST, northkent wrote: Good Morning Dr Panigrahi I cannot locate that we have received relevant paperwork relating to a request to take out a private prosecution. Please complete the attached application for summons detailing who and what you want to take out a private prosecution against. Once submitted this can then be referred to our legal team. Regards Dawn Macklin Admin Assistant and Virtual Court Administrator North & Central Kent Magistrates | HMCTS | Medway Magistrates Court | The Brook, Chatham | ME4 4JZ Phone: 01634 830232 Internal: 81491292 gov.uk/hmcts HM Courts & Tribunals Service logo Here is how HMCTS uses personal data about you Coronavirus (COVID-19): courts and tribunals planning and preparation From: YAHOO BLOCKING TEAM Sent: 17 October 2020 09:25 To: Paul R. Reddy Cc: northkent ; maidstonecrowncourt ; Dodds, District Judge Malcolm ; Dodds, DJ(MC) Malcolm ; Enquiries Kent Subject: Your communication to me this morning Dear Mr Reddy I received the attached email just now and went to my neighbour's house to speak to Hillary Harwood but the door was not opened. So I am confused by it all as the attached communications show: FrSlater&Gordon(LawFirmKrushnaHillary)17Oct2020; ToKamro(SalesAssistant)17Oct2020.docx; ToReed17Oct2020.docx; ToTwitter(LoginProblems)17Oct2020.docx; and ToPayPal17Oct2020.docx. Please note that the private prosecution that you are assisting me at NorthKentMagistrates Court and/or Maidstone Crown Court against the Chief Constable of Kent Police is ongoing for you to take immediate actions on my behalf or I will seek a brand new solicitor/barrister/LawFirm from the Law Society website now: Ref: FrMalcolmDodds(PrivateProsecutionofKentPolice)TRUNCATED2May2020.docx. Yours sincerely Dr Shantanu Panigrahi 3 Hoath Lane Wigmore Gillingham Kent ME8 0SL Tel: 07967789619 This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. Download all attachments as a zip file Toindeed20Oct2020.docx 18.7kB FrEuropeanCourtofHumanRights21Oct2020.docx 14kB Automatic Response MAIL/Inbox northkent To:YAHOO BLOCKING TEAM Thu, 22 Oct at 13:04 Thank you for your email. We have received your query and will ensure that the relevant person deals with it as soon as possible. Please do not re-send your query, as this will not result in it being dealt with any sooner. Please note: Court staff are not legally trained and so are unable to offer legal advice. If you are uncertain how to proceed, information can be found at www.gov.uk. If you are in doubt it is best to seek professional legal advice from a solicitor or Citizens Advice Bureau. Need to make a complaint? Get started here: https://www.resolver.co.uk/hmcts-complaints/ This e-mail and any attachments is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. Monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents.