11 November 2020 Attachments09:20 (0 minutes ago)
To County Court at Central London,
Royal Courts of Justice
Thomas More Building
Royal Courts of Justice
Maps and directions
County Court location code: 372
DX: 44453 Strand
For the attention of Honourable Judge Her Honour Judge Backhous, the Circuit Judge
I wish to update your ladyship this morning with the attached steps that I have taken in revising my Claimants Submission for your kind consideration: CLAIMANT'S SUBMISSION11November2020.docx; Central London County Court Judgement of Order 12 May 2020.docx; and ToCentralLondonEmploymentTribunal10Nov2020.docx.
Please alter your records to my new email address: Shanpanigrahi3000@gmail.com.
I look forward to hearing from you on any future Directions or Judgement on these particulars of Claim or Costs or damages and compensation in due course.
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi
3 Hoath Lane
Kent ME8 0SL
Central London County Court Judgement of Order 12 May 2020.docx
CLAIMANT’S SUBMISSION TO HER HONOUR JUDGE BACKHOUSE ON E35YM660 AT THE CENTRAL LONDON COUNTY COURT
To Her Honour Judge Backhouse My Ladyship Background: Appeal Arguments relating to the two Orders dated 14 January 2020 and 30 September 2020 were specifically submitted to the Defendant in my Updated Particulars of Claim on 24 March 19.31 hours by agreed email and updated since. This was made clear to the Court prior to 3 April 2020 Hearing presided over by Judge Backhouse on which the 12 May 2020 Order attached is based (Central London County Court or Order 12 May 2020.docx attached to this submission). Summary of petition 1. I wished to do something positive for national development of the United Kingdom so that it can contribute to World Conservation in order to improve global society and initiated the following petitions. Some were approved for hosting whereas others were inexplicably turned down and disabled by 38 Degrees and Liberty. I resorted to Action-network in view of this lack of cooperation. This is what my Appeal is all about.
Please refer to the following links in administering your decision on whether I am justified in voicing these concerns or not. If I am not, you may turn down my reconsideration of permission to Appeal the 14 January 2019 dated Order of the Court on E35YM660 (Dr Shantanu Panigrahi vs Mrs Theresa May; nay the present Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Mr Boris Johnson as the Defendant singly). 2. The petitions in question were: 38 Degrees websites:
2. Further evidence for my petitions may be examined at the following websites which have stood the test of time in that they were beyond criticisms from the general public because they are factual representations of the investigations that I have conducted in arriving at the petitions:
3. The evidence in these websites support the Particulars of Claim in the Claim Form and the Appellants Notice of a concerted national and international conspiracy against me to obstruct justice and pervert the course of justice by the States concerned. The government is therefore obliged to take these petitions seriously or give its reasons for not considering them through the normal processes of Parliamentary scrutiny. The functioning of the Parliament and the Monarchy must be subject to the due process of scrutiny through the Courts to outline individual responsibilities to society and hence this Claim that I am pursuing. Otherwise there is no hope for the nation that I love.
4. Madam, a Judge of Her Majesty’s Establishment is the law of the nation. Please therefore advise me if I am right or wrong in bringing this to your attention.
5. As you must be aware, I have only asked for a nominal £3000 in damages and compensation for what I have suffered over 22 years that led me to my published petitions because I am only progressing this Appeal proceedings in in sincere belief that it is in the public interest nationally and globally.
6. Please therefore advise me if a Judgement or Order can be considered now appropriately to bring a closure to this long-standing (22 year-old) saga.
Dr Shantanu Panigrahi (Claimant)
3 Hoath Lane
Kent ME8 0SL
Last Updated: 11 November 2020, 9.00 am hours (UK Time)
RELIGIOUS AND SECULAR 'BLASPHEMY' LAWS ARE INHUMAN
Decades ago when I was in my late teens I was enamoured by this oath in Courts of Law, 'I swear by Almighty God that the evidence that I shall give shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God'. Today I know that this is true and one of the most important self-motivational oaths/vows that humanity is blessed with. Truth has been divulged to us by God in various parts of the world through history, some writings more true than others, and humanity's quest and thrist for knowledge sees no bounds, so that the sky is the limit. This relates to the Mundaka Upanisad 'Satyamev Jayate' scripture too. I am personally of the view which is a fact for me today that God blesses those who are genuinely, sincerely, and honestly exploring Nature for the truth, through truth discovery and truth utterance every moment of their lives as the highest principle of them all. Honesty is the best policy. No-one on Heaven or Earth can destroy truth. For truth protects itself. This is the ultimate 'dharma' of duties and righteous actions through words. Actions against perceived injustices must always be non-violent, only dealt with from words which should not be construed as violence in words. For words come out from the depths of truth unpolluted from the interferences and complications of the body's desires to satisfy the senses. Religions such as Islam that say that speaking up against anything that others say as being the ultimate truth (once it is tested for oneself that it is not true to the satisfication of one's own mind) is blasphemy are wrong. I sympathise for the murdered victims of Charlie hebdo in France who raised this question against Islam and I sympathise with Salman Rushdie for having written the Satanic Versus that led him to become isolated in the peace and security of the wonderful world of the United Kingdom under Her Majesty's protection. This in no way is an endorsement for what Charlie hebdo or Salman Rushdie did and does not in any way call for the denigration of Islam, let me make this clear. I am voicing this to support the cause of truth and so speaking up against the response of Islam through Ayatollah Khomeine's fatwa to question those who are genuine truth-seekers doing so unpremeditatedly and nonchalantly by expressing their mind on questions that haunt us individually in our quest to better ourselves as human beings so that our wider society is then not suppressed from emancipation. Genuine asylum to escape from persecution from evil is in the United Kingdom and France that was the only country that offered me asylum in 2004 when I was trying to survive in the United Kingdom itself for speaking up for truth exploration and truth expression as the fundamental right of all the citizens of the world, and indeed should be raised as the first and most important Human Right in the European Court of Human Rights and within the United Kingdom in a Repeal of the Human Rights Act.
Suppression of the truth is religious discrimination and religious persecution, Wordpress, Twitter, Facebook, Odoo internet companies should note. There must be no censorship in the voicing against man-made laws, rules and regulations designed to enslave human beings as servants to those who have the ulterior motive to benefit from the power and wealth that enslavement of humanity brings to those economic interests: https://shantanup.wordpress.com should be immediately restored, and I plead upon President Elect Joe Biden to take this matter now to the Supreme Court of the United States of America following Findlaw's failure to do the same for me under President Trump interested in his tenure to make America great at the cost of the rest of humanity.
From 38 Degrees:
We Found A Problem With your petition We're concerned that the content of your petition might be inappropriate. A site admin said... this is a really serious issue, but 38 Degrees can only take UK signatures. Why not use an international campaigning platform like Avaaz? https://secure.avaaz.org/en/community_petitions/start_a_petition/ You can read our full terms and conditions here: https://you.38degrees.org.uk/tos Edit your petition to correct this issue. We'll review any changes you make. You can also get in touch to tell us more about the fight you're trying to win, and we may have a second look and re-enable your petition. To: The 38 Degrees Team * Subject * Content